One of the principal jobs of the commissioner of the National Hockey League – or any professional sports league for that matter – is to create value for his member franchises and their owners. Commissioners do that by creating league-wide conditions that grow the business of their member clubs.
The more revenues franchises generate, the greater their business valuation. When more franchises make more money, the average value increases throughout the league and that is good news for NHL club owners in the same way rising home prices and growing ownership equity is a boon for home owners.
So when it comes to franchise values, we give NHL commissioner Gary Bettman credit where it’s due. Values have grown under Bettman’s 17-year tenure several fold.
The question for any seasoned business valuator -- or any fan who cares about the game for that mattter -- is, however, what could be?
When one considers where the league could be without the stresses -- both public and private -- surrounding a group of under-performing hockey businesses in the southern U.S., Bettman's record raises red flags and deserves further scrutiny.
That’s because every single one of the NHL’s major business indicators – attendance, ticket prices, box office, merchandise sales, sponsorship sales, television audiences and revenues – would be even higher if the league had less U.S. sunbelt franchises and more Canadian or northern U.S. franchises.
Why Bettman has not pro-actively addressed the issue is one of the big blind spots in his leadership of the NHL. Why the NHL’s governors – the owners of the league’s 30 clubs – have not pushed more aggressively for solutions that would strengthen the league and improve their own lots considerably is an even bigger mystery.
If it’s true that you’re only as strong as your weakest link, the Phoenix Coyotes are a problem for the NHL. So are the Atlanta Thrashers. Throw in the case of the Florida Panthers – where less people are watching on FSN Florida (an average of 13,400 viewers per game) than are attending games in person (15,000 on a good night) – and you have at least three teams mired in red ink in questionable hockey markets.
Why not play to your strength? Why not license your product in markets where it is being gobbled up in record numbers? Why not replace your weak links with solid performers?
“The Case for Canada” report outlines just how bullish the Canadian market is for the NHL brand of hockey, especially in the period since the lockout in 2004-'05.
http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/could+cash+return+roots/3060451/story.html
It suggests that if the NHL relocated three of its weakest southern U.S. franchises to Canada, their individual franchise values would increase by more than 50 per cent and the league’s average team valuation would jump by $11 million US. It also submits that the combined revenues of the three relocated franchises would rise by $100 million per year, average attendance would grow by 6,000 more fans per game per franchise (or 738,000 more per season) and regional television audiences would increase twenty-fold. Yes, twenty-fold.
Yet more than anything, the report by TheSportMarket.biz and The Vancouver Sun makes a compelling case for the landing of at least one more NHL team in Canada. Plain and simple, the numbers clearly show how the NHL, its member franchises, broadcast partners and other corporate stakeholders – not to mention fans of the game in Canada – would be well-served if the NHL shifted its centre of gravity northward.
The proof is in the pudding of the hockey markets themselves. Considering market size, demographics and other attributes including affinity for sports in general and hockey in particular (as Forbes Magazine does in its annual list of NHL franchise values), the average NHL market contributes $84 million to its franchise valuation (out of about $210 million in average overall value).
Sun belt markets are considerably weaker; the market attributes of Phoenix, Atlanta and Florida for hockey average out at only $48.3 million according to Forbes.com. That's about half the average U.S. hockey market value and about 40 per cent that of the average Canadian market.
Those numbers exemplify how the sunbelt teams are dragging down the average value of NHL franchises the way shabby houses devalue entire neighbourhoods.
The Case for Canada is clear. It’s your move commissioner Bettman.
www.TheSportMarket.biz
The Sport Market on TEAM 1040 and teamradio.ca
Saturdays, 9 a.m. to 12 noon PT
Facebook.com/TheSportMarket and Twitter.com/TheSportMarket
Showing posts with label Florida Panthers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Florida Panthers. Show all posts
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Saturday, May 1, 2010
The NHL on television in 2009-'10: Canadian Bulls and Southern U.S. Bears
When more Canadians watch the NHL Draft Lottery on TSN (an average national audience of 556,000 this year) than Americans watch actual live game action during the regular season on Versus (averaging 297,000 in 2009-'10), it puts into perspective how the National Hockey League in general and NHL television in particular is a tale of two countries.
The NHL and the NHL on TV is hot in Canada. Not so much in the U.S., especially the further south you go.
Depending on how you look at it, Canadians are 10 to 20 times more likely to watch the NHL on TV than our American friends to the south. In a market 10 times the size of Canada, the NHL averages 1.6 million viewers on NBC during the regular season, less than the early game average of 1.8 million CBC drives through its Hockey Night in Canada franchise. Similarly, TSN (714,000) outperforms Versus (297,000) on cable, more than two-to-one in absolute terms and more than 20:1 per capita.
There's no better picture, however, of how different a proposition the NHL is in Canada compared to the U.S. than in the local and regional television ratings of the league's 30 clubs. Despite some good gains in the era of the NHL Winter Classic on NBC, the U.S. market is still a tough nut to crack for the NHL. If Canada is a rampaging bull market for NHL hockey -- which it is -- then the southern U.S. is a lame bear.
It's all mapped out in this week's Helijet Top Ten Bull Pen at http://www.thesportmarket.biz/ and www.Facebook.com/TheSportMarket (which lists the Top Ten, Middle Ten and Bottom Ten NHL television markets).
http://www.facebook.com/thesportmarket?ref=ts#!/photo.php?pid=3769385&id=280702824731
We'll let the listing of regional television audiences in the NHL speak for itself. What we will do is give you our Top Ten takes on where the NHL is at in television in Canada compared to the U.S.:
10 - The top four television markets in the NHL during the 2009-'10 regular season were Canada's four largest media markets: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary. They all trumped larger U.S. designated market areas such as New York, Los Angeles and Chicago;
9 - Six of the top nine regional television audiences in the NHL were held by Canada's six NHL franchises;
8 - The hottest U.S. NHL television market is Pittsburgh, home of Sidney Crosby and the defending champion Penguins. Fox Sportsnet Pittsburgh this year drove 93,000 households and 214,100 viewers per regular season game. Next in line are the fast-rising Chicago Blackhawks on Comcast Sportsnet and WGN TV (196,800 viewers per game) and the seemingly perennial Stanley Cup-contending Detroit Red Wings (186,500);
7 - There's parity on the ice but not in television ratings: the NHL's big three when it comes to regional television numbers -- Montreal Canadiens, Toronto Maple Leafs and Vancouver Canucks -- have larger audiences than the next 10 clubs combined (1,742,900 to 1,673,700);
6 - The Canadian regional television average audience is 383,167, which is more than two-and-a-half times the NHL average of 141,040 and almost five times the U.S. regional average of 80,508;
5 - The NHL's so-called Original Six franchises (Montreal, Toronto, Boston, New York, Detroit and Chicago) average 313,333 viewers per regional telecast. The last six NHL expansions average 34,583. The last six relocated franchises average 78,233 (but that drops to an average of 49,620 when you take out Calgary);
4 - The average Canadian NHL television market is more than 10 times stronger than the average U.S. sun belt TV market. And that's in absolute terms (383K to 34K);
3 - Canada's six NHL franchises draw more regional television viewers than all 24 U.S. clubs combined (2,299,000 cumulative in Canada compared to 1,932,200 aggregate in the U.S.). In fact, the top four Canadian teams (Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary) do that with 1,964,200 combined;
2 - It takes the NHL's bottom 11 television markets (cumulatively representing average viewership of 376,500 per game) to come close to matching the Vancouver Canucks' team average of 398,500 on Rogers Sportsnet Pacific. You have to add five more NHL clubs -- for a total of 16 or more than half of the league -- to rival the 650K plus regional averages of Toronto and Montreal (with the asterix that the Canadiens' regional rightsholder is RDS, a French-language national cable carrier);
1 - The Florida Panthers, playing before the smallest TV audiences in the NHL, have to log 49 regionally-televised games (1.2 seasons of home games or more than a half-season of total games) to match what the Toronto Maple Leafs or Montreal Canadiens each draw in ONE game.
When you rate the NHL's other bear TV markets (Atlanta, where it takes 36 Thrasher telecasts to equal one Habs game, or Tampa, Nashville or Raleigh, where it takes those teams 26 games to match the Leafs, or Phoenix, 25 games), it paints a picture that at some point the league will have to address: its southern U.S. plan in general and sunbelt strategy in particular.
When less people are watching your product on television than they are in-arena -- which is the case in Miami -- you have a fundamental problem. Not enough people care.
That's not the problem everywhere in the U.S., of course. It's not so much the issue in southern California, at least when the Ducks and Kings are winning. It's not a problem in the northern U.S. markets. And, it's certainly not a challenge in Canada, where we drink the NHL on televison like we do beer.
www.TheSportMarket.biz
The Sport Market on TEAM 1040 and teamradio.ca
Saturdays, 9 a.m. to 12 noon PT
Facebook.com/TheSportMarket and Twitter.com/TheSportMarket
The NHL and the NHL on TV is hot in Canada. Not so much in the U.S., especially the further south you go.
Depending on how you look at it, Canadians are 10 to 20 times more likely to watch the NHL on TV than our American friends to the south. In a market 10 times the size of Canada, the NHL averages 1.6 million viewers on NBC during the regular season, less than the early game average of 1.8 million CBC drives through its Hockey Night in Canada franchise. Similarly, TSN (714,000) outperforms Versus (297,000) on cable, more than two-to-one in absolute terms and more than 20:1 per capita.
There's no better picture, however, of how different a proposition the NHL is in Canada compared to the U.S. than in the local and regional television ratings of the league's 30 clubs. Despite some good gains in the era of the NHL Winter Classic on NBC, the U.S. market is still a tough nut to crack for the NHL. If Canada is a rampaging bull market for NHL hockey -- which it is -- then the southern U.S. is a lame bear.
It's all mapped out in this week's Helijet Top Ten Bull Pen at http://www.thesportmarket.biz/ and www.Facebook.com/TheSportMarket (which lists the Top Ten, Middle Ten and Bottom Ten NHL television markets).
http://www.facebook.com/thesportmarket?ref=ts#!/photo.php?pid=3769385&id=280702824731
We'll let the listing of regional television audiences in the NHL speak for itself. What we will do is give you our Top Ten takes on where the NHL is at in television in Canada compared to the U.S.:
10 - The top four television markets in the NHL during the 2009-'10 regular season were Canada's four largest media markets: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary. They all trumped larger U.S. designated market areas such as New York, Los Angeles and Chicago;
9 - Six of the top nine regional television audiences in the NHL were held by Canada's six NHL franchises;
8 - The hottest U.S. NHL television market is Pittsburgh, home of Sidney Crosby and the defending champion Penguins. Fox Sportsnet Pittsburgh this year drove 93,000 households and 214,100 viewers per regular season game. Next in line are the fast-rising Chicago Blackhawks on Comcast Sportsnet and WGN TV (196,800 viewers per game) and the seemingly perennial Stanley Cup-contending Detroit Red Wings (186,500);
7 - There's parity on the ice but not in television ratings: the NHL's big three when it comes to regional television numbers -- Montreal Canadiens, Toronto Maple Leafs and Vancouver Canucks -- have larger audiences than the next 10 clubs combined (1,742,900 to 1,673,700);
6 - The Canadian regional television average audience is 383,167, which is more than two-and-a-half times the NHL average of 141,040 and almost five times the U.S. regional average of 80,508;
5 - The NHL's so-called Original Six franchises (Montreal, Toronto, Boston, New York, Detroit and Chicago) average 313,333 viewers per regional telecast. The last six NHL expansions average 34,583. The last six relocated franchises average 78,233 (but that drops to an average of 49,620 when you take out Calgary);
4 - The average Canadian NHL television market is more than 10 times stronger than the average U.S. sun belt TV market. And that's in absolute terms (383K to 34K);
3 - Canada's six NHL franchises draw more regional television viewers than all 24 U.S. clubs combined (2,299,000 cumulative in Canada compared to 1,932,200 aggregate in the U.S.). In fact, the top four Canadian teams (Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary) do that with 1,964,200 combined;
2 - It takes the NHL's bottom 11 television markets (cumulatively representing average viewership of 376,500 per game) to come close to matching the Vancouver Canucks' team average of 398,500 on Rogers Sportsnet Pacific. You have to add five more NHL clubs -- for a total of 16 or more than half of the league -- to rival the 650K plus regional averages of Toronto and Montreal (with the asterix that the Canadiens' regional rightsholder is RDS, a French-language national cable carrier);
1 - The Florida Panthers, playing before the smallest TV audiences in the NHL, have to log 49 regionally-televised games (1.2 seasons of home games or more than a half-season of total games) to match what the Toronto Maple Leafs or Montreal Canadiens each draw in ONE game.
When you rate the NHL's other bear TV markets (Atlanta, where it takes 36 Thrasher telecasts to equal one Habs game, or Tampa, Nashville or Raleigh, where it takes those teams 26 games to match the Leafs, or Phoenix, 25 games), it paints a picture that at some point the league will have to address: its southern U.S. plan in general and sunbelt strategy in particular.
When less people are watching your product on television than they are in-arena -- which is the case in Miami -- you have a fundamental problem. Not enough people care.
That's not the problem everywhere in the U.S., of course. It's not so much the issue in southern California, at least when the Ducks and Kings are winning. It's not a problem in the northern U.S. markets. And, it's certainly not a challenge in Canada, where we drink the NHL on televison like we do beer.
www.TheSportMarket.biz
The Sport Market on TEAM 1040 and teamradio.ca
Saturdays, 9 a.m. to 12 noon PT
Facebook.com/TheSportMarket and Twitter.com/TheSportMarket
Labels:
CBC,
Florida Panthers,
Hockey Night in Canada,
Montreal Canadiens,
National Hockey League,
NBC,
NHL,
RDS,
television ratings,
Toronto Maple Leafs,
TSN,
Vancouver Canucks,
Versus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

